Noynoy Aquino: defying the Supreme Court!

I came across an interesting exchange between two noted stalwarts of the Establishment Blogger community. It transpired in a comment thread of a recent article published on a noted Establishment Blog:

UP n Grad on Mon, 22nd Mar 2010 6:51 pm

Noynoy has revealed an important part of his understanding of the separation of powers when he said that he will not recognize a justice of the supreme court appointed by his immediate predecessor. That Noynoy has begun to walk back from his words of bravadura does not negate that he has a willingness to disregard the Constitutional process out of spite?

mlq3 on Mon, 22nd Mar 2010 9:34 pm

How has he begun to walk back? He said he would not recognize a Chief Justice appointed by the President -and rightly so. The whole point of the issue is that the Constitution is being violated, on that there is a sizeable consensus; the republic is being parboiled.

Abe N. Margallo on Mon, 22nd Mar 2010 10:37 pm

And remember, the Constitution is the one that is supreme, not the the Court’s decision (unconstitutionally) interpreting it.

Excuse me, Mr. Quezon, but rightly so? By what or whose authority do you condone a President not recognising an appointed officer of the judiciary? Oh, I see, as your pal Abe Margallo chimed in, the Constitution is “supreme” and anyone who feels it’s been violated can act. I suppose, then, that this “authority” you invoke comes from this nebulous but popular concept called “the people’s will”.

Emo Politics alert!

Emo Politics alert!

Guys, guys, isn’t that the reason why we have a Supreme Court? My understanding is that said court is “supreme” as far as its vested authority as an institution to interpret the Constitution. The fundamental fallacy here that imprisons the “expert” minds of the venerable Manuel L Quezon III and Abe Margallo is around this rather quaint holding up of the Constitution as a self-evident edict — one that is above the context provided by human society and the government of institutions created around it. What a crock. It’s the kind of moronic thinking not too different from that of fundamentalist sects of many organised religions in the way they hold up their respective holy scriptures as “ultimate” writs that are open for any schmoe — including schmoes that hold extremist sentiments — to interpret.

Using that “school of thought” (as Margallo tends to compartmentalise things himself), Quezon and Margallo open the Constitution to arbitrary interpretation by any bozo with at least Fourth Grade reading comprehension skills. It brings up a picture in my mind of an Arab kid fresh out of a Madrassah interpreting the Koran as a call to strap on some TNT and walk into a restaurant full of innocent diners and doing just that. Indeed, these two “experts” on political “thinking” open the doors to vacuous minds in our intellectually-bankrupt society to see perverse “heroics” in a president openly defying a Supreme Court Chief Justice and — here’s the punchline — laying the groundwork for the sub-ideological underpinnings for another “revolutionary” storm to brew. For that matter the administration of, popular presidential candidate Benigno “Noynoy” Aquino III is virtually expected to be revolutionarily-themed. His campaign and its Laban iconography derives its popular appeal from the “revolutionary” government of his mother. “Rebelling” against the Chief Justice is a perverse reflection of that theme.

Noynoy Aquino will, as President, be facing a bureaucracy and a complex of institutions that he will most likely be unable to get on top of over the course of his six-year term. He will be likely to be constantly playing The Victim Card to mask his failure to show everyone who’s boss. Funny enough that senators do it, but I wouldn’t be surprised if we will one day find President Noynoy Aquino on Manila’s streets protesting his own government! Considering that even now he attempts to muzzle the press and avoid public debate, that’s not a very farfetched scenario.

And so here we see his chief publicists (in whatever official or unofficial capacity they step up to that dubious distinction) paving the way for the kind of administration Noynoy Aquino will be presiding over. His mother’s “Constitution” as an embodiment of the grotesque infinite regress that describes the nebulous notion of “the people’s will”.

Ultimately who or what represents the “people’s will”? Is it a street mob? Or is it a representation facilitated by democratic institutions?

So a Chief Justice will be appointed by President Gloria Arroyo before her term ends. So what? Is that enough reason for a future President to defy an entire institution? The members of the Supreme Court considering an interpretation of the Constitution made a call to accept such an appointment. Flawed as some may consider this to be, they still did so as officers of an institution to which the authority was given to. It’s a choice between respecting a flawed institution or entrusting interpreting The Law to any schmoe, mob, or — yes — a couple of self-described “experts” on the matter.


About benign0

benign0 is the Web master of
This entry was posted in Government and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Noynoy Aquino: defying the Supreme Court!

  1. BenK says:

    Cripes, what a couple of idiots. Uphold democracy and its institutions — unless those do not return the desired result, then eff ’em.

    Careful with that finger, Noy. You don’t know where that finger’s been.

  2. ChinoF says:

    Emo politics alert all right. Anti-Incumbentism alert too. Add to those Backward Thinking (or even Non-Thinking) Alert! Again, true progressive thinking is being sabotaged by a bunch of Emo-crats.

  3. danny says:

    mlq3 on Mon, 22nd Mar 2010 9:34 pm

    “How has he begun to walk back? He said he would not recognize a Chief Justice appointed by the President -and rightly so. The whole point of the issue is that the Constitution is being violated, on that there is a sizeable consensus; the republic is being parboiled.”

    How did you come up with your “sizeable consensus”? How many are they, a hundred, a thousand, or just you and Abe?

    • benign0 says:

      Indeed. And even then, whatever “consensus” is formed, so what? An Edsa street “revolution” can be considered (mostly by morons) to be a “consensus”. But guess what: at the end of the day, a real democracy is not the same as a lynch mob. The earlier works off institutions while the latter works off, well, mobs.

      Morons prefer to join mobs, because mobs do not follow systems. Building and maintaining systems requires thinking — an activity that Pinoys have never quite become renowned for. Simple logic. A society that finds no merit in thinking exhibits a pathetically weak inclination to build systems that work for them. Rather than fix recurring issues by fixing what causes them within the underlying systems that govern the behaviours that frame them, we simply take the easy way out and let our renowned mob mentality take over.

    • BenK says:

      “Sizeable consensus” is a weasel term. (And ‘sizeable’ is actually a meaningless adjective — it indicates ‘something to which a size can be attributed’, so…maybe it’s a tiny size? A huge size? Who knows? Mr. Explainer ought to buy himself a damn dictionary.) You have to watch out for these kind of weasel terms in the commentaries of, well, anybody, but especially these so-called arbiters of correct thinking, because they use them a lot. When somebody says something like, “Some say” or “There is a feeling that” all they are expressing are their individual opinions, and trying to buy validity from you, the reader, by assigning them some vague attribution to an undefined group to make you feel as though your not accepting the notion uncritically is egregious.

  4. UP n grad says:

    It is practically a given that GMA leaves Malacanang in a few weeks. Reason — she follows the 1987 Constitution. Likewise FVR tried to get term-limits extended, but when he could not get it done, he too conformed to the 1987 Constitution and he left office.

    Time to look forward elections May2010 and think. Have any candidates expressed otherwise? To me (my personal opinion, others may believe otherwise) My personal opinion is that it is critical whoever you vote for — when the majority of the Pilipinas Supreme Court decides against his/her political (or familial) interests, that he will follow the decision of the Supreme Court.

    Laban! Never again!

  5. Pingback: President-Elect Noynoy Aquino: Threatening the Philippine Supreme Court | Anti-Pinoy :)

  6. rinz says:

    On Corona: SC decision is final and it can only be repealed or modified by another of its decision, there is a process to correct this and everyone have to abide by this process, the President is not stupid not to know this so dont treat all of us like you are so damn smart!! The President is just showing us how unsettled for his department of the decision of the judiciary regarding this matter and political actions will be taken to correct this-that is precisely what he sending as a message. Isnt that the right thing to do?, precisely the essence of check and balance, we expect him to do that as we expect the other political departments will do to him on his own actions-this is called democracy!! In law my opinion is this-our constitution is very clear and the narvasa rule is very very clear in explaining it and it is very clear that our constitution should be taken in its entirety and not separately otherwise there will be no coordinations in the interpretations of powers- this is precisely the source of my objection and the problem of the current decision. pls read your law before you talk to much!! What are the reasons behind the sudden change of SC decision? this is the question you should be answering. be mature!!

  7. nymphetamine says:

    Kaya nga di ko favorite color ang yellow eh… 😉

  8. Pingback: Truth Commission: another “initiative” killed by Malacanang incompetence

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s